next up previous contents
Next: Reduced Relatives Up: Complementizers and clauses Previous: Complementizers and clauses

Further constraints on the null Comp C

There are additional constraints on where the null Comp C can occur. The null Comp is not permitted in cases of subject extraction unless there is an intervening clause or or the relative clause is a reduced relative (mode = ppart/ger). This can be seen in ((243)-(246)).
(242)0(242
(243)
*the toy [i [C [ i likes Dafna]]]  (243)0(243
(244)
the toy [i [C Fred thinks [ i likes Dafna]]]  (244)0(244
(245)
the boy [i [C [ i eating the guava]]]  (245)0(245
(246)
the guava [i [C [ i eaten by the boy]]] 

To model this paradigm, the feature rel-pron is used in conjunction with the following equations:

The full set of the equations shown above is only present in Comp substitution trees involving subject extraction. So ((247)) will not be ruled out.
(246)0(246
(247)
the toy [i [C [ Dafna likes i ]]] 

The feature mismatch induced by the above equations is not remedied by adjunction of just any S-adjunct because all other S-adjuncts are transparent to the rel-pron feature because of the following equation:
Sm.b:rel-pron Sf.t:rel-pron


next up previous contents
Next: Reduced Relatives Up: Complementizers and clauses Previous: Complementizers and clauses
XTAG Project
http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~xtag