CIS Homeline

 

CIS Home divider Penn Engineering divider PENN   spacer
 

 
  David G. Stork : Did the great masters "cheat" using optics? The mysterious rise in naturalism in Renaissance painting  

In 2001, artist David Hockney and scientist Charles Falco stunned the art world with a controversial theory that, if correct, would profoundly alter our view of the development of image making. They claimed that as early as 1420, Renaissance artists employed optical devices such as concave mirrors to project images onto their canvases, which they then traced or painted over. In this way, the theory attempts to explain the newfound heightened naturalism or "opticality" of painters such as Jan van Eyck, Robert Campin, Hans Holbein the Younger, and many others.


This talk for general audiences, profusely illustrated with Renaissance paintings, will present the results of the first independent examinations of the Hockney/Falco theory. It covers basic geometrical optics of image formation, shadows and perspective as well as 15th-century technology with special emphasis on Lotto's "Husband and wife" (1543), van Eyck's "Portrait of Arnolfini and his wife" (1434), Caravaggio's "Supper at Emmaus" (1596-8) and Campin's "Merode Altarpiece" (1425). While there remain some loose ends, an analysis of the paintings, infra-red reflectograms, modern reenactments, internal consistency of the theory, and alternate explanations allows us to judge with high confidence the plausibility of this new theory.

You may never see Renaissance paintings the same way again

(<http://www-psych.stanford.edu/~stork/FAQs.html>http://www-psych.stanford.edu/~stork/FAQs.html).


 
 
CIS Home divider Penn Engineering divider PENN   spacer